Finance

Nasdaq and NYSE are suing their regulator over a pilot they say could put some ETFs out of business

Stacey Cunningham, First Female President of the NYSE
NYSE head Stacey Cunningham filed suit against the SEC. Stock News Hub
Read in app

The two largest US stock exchanges have filed lawsuits against their own regulator. 

NYSE and Nasdaq both filed suits against the Securities and Exchange Commission this week for what they say is an unfair pilot program the regulator plans to launch examining their pricing model for transaction fees and rebates.

The Transaction Fee Pilot, which was approved in December, was designed by the SEC to examine how exchanges' transaction fees and rebates impact where brokers choose to route clients' orders. Some market participants have suggested orders are routed not where brokers can get the best execution but instead where they'll see the highest rebates, fees paid by exchanges to brokers for bringing liquidity to their markets.

The SEC's pilot, which could last up to two years, will create two test groups of securities in which either transaction fees will be limited or rebates will be prohibited. 

In an op-ed published Thursday in the Wall Street Journal titled "We're Suing the SEC to Protect the Stock Market", Stacey Cunningham, NYSE's president, laid out the exchange's reasoning.

"In practice, the new rule amounts to an unnecessary exercise in government price-setting that will add a new layer of complexity to equity markets," Cunningham said in the op-ed, which also appeared on her LinkedIn

Nasdaq filed its own lawsuit on Friday morning and published a report from its chief economist, Phil Mackintosh, detailing analysis of the markets is possible without collecting more data. Chicago-based Cboe Global Markets followed suit on Friday as well. 

While the three exchanges all filed separately, Tal Cohen, the senior vice president of North American equities at Nasdaq, told Business Insider the crux of their arguments are similar.

"We don't think this serves capital formation well. We think this picks winners and losers between issuers. That is corporate and ETFs. We think it's a bad precedent. We think it is price controls. We think it alters the competitive dynamics," Cohen said.

Read more: The Wall Street battle over skyrocketing market data fees could reach a boiling point in 2019

In a media roundtable on Friday, Michael Blaugrund, head of transactions at NYSE, explained the potential ramifications of the pilot, singling out exchange-traded products as one victim.

Two exchange-traded funds could be based on the same index, he said, effectively making them interchangeable. If one is required to no longer offer rebates as part of the pilot, its competitor could benefit significantly as it would attract more market makers and be able to offer a tighter price spread, he added.

"That strikes us as a totally inappropriate role for the SEC to play, picking winners and losers amongst issuers," Blaugrund said. "Proposal will be for two years, which could well be long enough to put an ETF out of business."

Cohen echoed similar sentiments about the risk the pilot poses the ETF market. 

"For these young ETFs, if the market makers pull back, if lit liquidity spreads out, then investor interest will wane," Cohen said. "If investor interest wane, AUM will go down or doesn't grow. You absolutely could see, especially with the new continuous listing rules, some of these ETFs facing a tough decision."

The SEC declined to comment. 

The fight over the merits of the SEC's pilot is just one of the ongoing industry debates Nasdaq and NYSE are at the center of. Deliberation over exchanges' market data fees has heated up recently, with some market structure experts predicting that the continued increase of fees has reached a boiling point where a compromise is imminent. 

A win against the SEC over the Transaction Fee Pilot could also be considered bittersweet, as the exchange will need to continue to interact with the regulator going forward. However, Blaugrund stands by the choice. 

"It's a very difficult decision to decide to take your primary regulatory to court," Blaugrund said. "That being said, we feel really strong that this is overreaching and we need to draw a clear line in the sand because we do work with them on every aspect of the business."

Sign up here for our weekly newsletter Wall Street Insider, a behind-the-scenes look at the stories dominating banking, business, and big deals.

Read next

Dan DeFrancesco
Dan DeFrancesco
Dan is the lead writer for BI Today, Business Insider's flagship daily newsletter. Sometimes he interviews executives about everything from AI's impact on capitalism to robotics to the potential SaaSpocalypse. Sometimes he makes Mad Libs for AI-driven layoff announcements.Dan previously covered financial technology and market structure for BI as a reporter and editor. His work includes everything from inside Robinhood's failed "Checking and Savings" product that eventually led to Congress getting involved to the internal arguments over JPMorgan's failed attempt to launch a finance app for millennials.Before joining BI, Dan wrote about derivatives and commodities for Risk.net and fintech for WatersTechnology. If you played high school sports in the lower Hudson Valley between 2012 and 2014 there's a good chance he wrote about you during his first real journalism job at The Journal News. Got a tip? Contact this editor via email at ddefrancesco@bjinnox.com.