Entertainment

The 'Lion King' remake is a game changer for the movie business, but its stunning visual effects are also its biggest weakness

The Lion King 2
"The Lion King." Disney
Read in app

Review banner

Disney's "live-action" remake of "The Lion King" (in theaters July 19) is the boldest update of one of Disney's classic animated movies to date.

It takes the photo-realistic computer-generated animation used in 2016's "The Jungle Book" (which went on to make close to $1 billion worldwide at the box office) and elevates it beyond anything done before. The look of this movie is so sharp and stunning, it feels as if you're watching a nature documentary.

The "Jungle Book" director Jon Favreau is once again at the helm for this landmark moment in movies. From the lush vistas of the African plains to close-ups of a mouse scurrying around, every frame of this movie looks real. That's especially true of the animals who make up the characters of the story, and that is where Favreau's dedication to reality in the visuals butts heads with his storytelling.

"The Lion King" is Shakespearean in its story. A king is killed by his brother, and the heir to the throne goes into self-banishment over the belief that he was the cause of his father's death. Throughout the movie, there are stirring proclamations and heated encounters. But because of the realistic nature of this version of the story, the animals' mouths move but there are little to no facial expressions. Favreau even has said he didn't do any facial motion-capture effects of the actors specifically so the animal's movements (including their faces) were as realistic as possible. That's where I feel the movie loses some of its emotion.

the lion king
What the "Lion King" remake lacks compared with the original are basic expressions on the characters so you care about them.  The Lion King/Facebook

Chiwetel Ejiofor gives a powerful performance as Scar, and Beyoncé sings her heart out as Nala, but the audience doesn't get the full emotional tug because the eye doesn't generate what the ear gets. Though, strangely, that's not the case with the comedy in the movie. The bickering between the hyenas Kamari (Keegan-Michael Key) and Azizi (Eric André), the one-liners by Zazu (John Oliver), and the scene-stealing back-and-forth from Pumbaa (Seth Rogen) and Timon (Billy Eichner) are even funnier because of the lack of expressions when the jokes are delivered.

Read more: 6 Marvel Cinematic Universe actors who are among the highest-paid celebrities in the world

"The Lion King" is a technological filmmaking feat and will surely go on to become a huge moneymaker for Disney, as you really need to go to the theater to soak in the experience. But, like the 3D craze, the tech cannot be a movie's foundation.

Thankfully for Disney, these visual effects were done to a movie that's a beloved classic — one with memorable songs throughout and even elements of the popular Broadway adaptation sprinkled in. Many people heading into the movie will not just be familiar with the material but have it embedded in their lives.

The Liong King 3
Zazu and Simba in 2019's "The Lion King."  Disney

But for me, the "realness" in this version made me conflicted. I didn't have any emotional connection to Simba's (Donald Glover) journey. Some specific scenes were even stronger "real" than animated, though. The death of Mufasa (James Earl Jones, who voiced the character in the original movie) and the reaction by Simba is gut-wrenching.

Favreau has certainly shown us the future with this movie. The opening sequence, in which all the animals converge on Pride Rock to celebrate the birth of Simba with "Circle of Life" being sung over it, is powerful to watch, as you will be in awe of how realistic all the animals look. But Favreau took things a little too far when it came to making the storytelling match the movie's authenticity.

Read next

Jason Guerrasio
Jason Guerrasio
Jason Guerrasio is an award-winning entertainment correspondent at Business Insider and has covered various aspects of the film industry for over two decades. On the site, his reporting can range from what's going on behind the scenes at some of the biggest companies in Hollywood, colorful interviews with some of the most well-known names in entertainment, and exploring the darker side of the industry.In 2020, Jason received the New York Press Club award and Los Angeles Press Club award for his story on the rise and fall of MoviePass. It has since been made into the Emmy-nominated HBO documentary "MoviePass, MovieCrash."Previous to BI, Jason was the managing editor at Filmmaker Magazine, one of the leading publications in the independent film industry. He's also written for numerous publications over the years, including Vanity Fair, Esquire, Rolling Stone, Vulture, Variety, and indieWire.Popular ArticlesMary Carole McDonnell built a true-crime empire. Then the FBI came for her. Growing up Marvel: The tormented life of Stan Lee's child, JC LeeA bullet. A legend. A lie. Bufford Pusser killed his wife, authorities say. What happens to his legacy now?