Tech

The number of people actively using Twitter may actually be in decline

Read in app

The number of people actively using Twitter by tweeting or creating new accounts peaked in August 2014 and is now in decline, a source with access to Twitter's user data tells Business Insider.

According to Twitter's official disclosure of "monthly active users" (MAUs), the platform's audience hit a high of 288 million in Q4 2014. But MAUs are defined as any user who logs in to Twitter, even if they do not do anything. MAUs thus count a lot of people who use Twitter passively, for instance through mobile phone lockscreen apps that ping Twitter automatically for updates.  

Twitter does not break out the number of people who tweet or create an account within a given month. That number — which we're referring to as "people actively using Twitter" for the purposes of this article — is interesting because it describes the users who aren't just logged in automatically because they failed to log out from the month before. Rather, it describes users who are actively, intentionally using the system — Twitter's core audience, in other words.

That core might be in decline according to our source. People actively using Twitter hit a high of 145 million in August of last year, but since then the number tumbled to 129 million:

twitter maus
Business Insider

In this chart, the blue line showing "active" users is the total of the red line of people who tweeted and the green line of people who created a new account.

Twitter declined comment, citing the pre-earnings quiet period.

The company recently moved again to restrict data that gets seen by partner software and app development companies. It terminated agreements with third parties for reselling so-called "firehose data" earlier this month, according to TechCrunch.

Last year, Twitter cracked down on other companies publishing independent user statistics based on Twitter's own data, kicking several of them off the company's API, which is used by developers to make apps and suck data out of Twitter.

The data from our source has flaws: It is not drawn from the full dataset which Twitter uses to compose the MAU counts it discloses to the SEC and investors. And it is composed from a series of sample counts of monthly users, on irregular dates rather than at standard periods.

But it might worry investors ahead of Twitter's Q1 2015 earnings call because it shows another way in which Twitter appears to have trouble growing users. According to Twitter's SEC disclosures, the population of users whose only activity on the platform consisted of a third-party app automatically pinging the platform for updates went as high as 25 million in Q4 2015.

growth of users non humans
Twitter / BI


Last year, Twitter's stock price was hammered down to lows of about $30 when investors realized that its MAU growth was going to be nowhere near the scale of Facebook's. But in the meantime, TWTR recovered nicely to above $50 as investors decided that Twitter's revenue performance — which is healthy — was more important than the growth of its user-base.

We also don't know whether the decline comes from a seasonal blip — the high was just after the World Cup — or a long-term trend.

This morning, Bank of America Merrill Lynch put out an investor note from Justin Post and his team that says most investors are expecting MAUs to grow to 302 - 304 million in Q1 2015. If Twitter reports a number beneath that level it will be regarded as a negative surprise. However, Twitter can still grow MAUs even when people actively using Twitter are in decline. So whether a decline in people actively using Twitter is meaningful or not won't be answered specifically on tomorrow's earnings call.

Disclosure: The author owns Twitter stock.

Read next

Jim is the former editor-in-chief of Insider's news division.Previously he was the founding editor of Business Insider UK.He has also been managing editor at Adweek, an advertising columnist at CBS Interactive, and a Knight-Bagehot Fellow at Columbia Business School. His work has appeared in Slate, Salon, The Independent, MTV, The Nation and AOL.His investigative journalism changed the law in the US First Circuit Court of Appeals (U.S. v. Kravetz), the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (North Jersey Media v. Ashcroft), New Jersey (In Re El-Atriss), and New York State (Mosallem v. Berenson).The US Supreme Court cited his work on the death penalty in the concurrence to Baze v. Rees, on the issue of whether lethal injection is cruel or unusual.He won the Neal award for business journalism in 2005 for a series investigating bribes and kickbacks in the advertising business.Here's a selection of his past stories:    The alleged betrayal in these photos, texts, and emails cost Snapchat $158 million    Inside the conspiracy that forced Dov Charney out of American Apparel    The Evolution of Ev: The creator of Twitter, Blogger, and Medium has a plan to fix the mess he made of the internet    THE "KNOCK-IN SHORT": Nigel Farage and the massive bet against the pound on the night of the Brexit vote    eBay worked with the FBI to put its top affiliate marketer in prison    How Dunkin Donuts ended up hiring a psychotic credit card thief as director of communications    BEJEWELED: The definitive, illustrated history of the most underrated game ever   • The CEO of Publicis told us how he stared down a furious internal rebellion to bet the future of his $11 billion company on artificial intelligence   • FBX: The billion-dollar Facebook business that never happened   • The €150 million check-kiting scam that bankrupted Leo Burnett in Greece   • My Polaroids of the September 11 attacks led me into America's secret court system for terrorist suspects   • YouTube deleted 130 rap videos to help police fight street gangs responsible for thousands of stabbingsDisclosure: I own shares of Twitter (TWTR).